{"id":2726,"date":"2025-02-15T20:20:10","date_gmt":"2025-02-15T21:20:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.developeternal.com\/?p=2726"},"modified":"2025-02-15T21:26:50","modified_gmt":"2025-02-15T21:26:50","slug":"fyodor-lukyanov-vance-only-said-what-americans-really-think","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.developeternal.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/15\/fyodor-lukyanov-vance-only-said-what-americans-really-think\/","title":{"rendered":"Fyodor Lukyanov: Vance only said what Americans really think"},"content":{"rendered":"
The EU needs the Cold War to continue, but the US VP\u2019s Munich speech signals a transatlantic divorce<\/strong><\/p>\n US Vice President J.D. Vance\u2019s landmark speech at the Munich Security Conference on Friday has been attributed to various factors. Some say it was an act of revenge. For years, Western European leaders have denounced Donald Trump and his supporters, never considering that they might one day have to answer for their words. Now, the response has arrived, and the EU is left bewildered, asking: \u201cWhy us?\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n But beyond personal grievances, there is a deeper ideological divergence at play. In many ways, Vance\u2019s critique of the Europeans echoed the same accusations that the settlers of the New World leveled at the Old Continent centuries ago: tyranny, hypocrisy, and parasitism. The rejection of European political traditions laid the ideological foundation for the American state three hundred years ago. Now that dispute over what constitutes real democracy has evolved from an internal American debate into a transatlantic one\u00a0\u2013 and its outcome will shape the future.<\/p>\n Yet the most crucial element of Vance\u2019s speech goes beyond personalities or ideological rifts. It reflects a fundamental shift in global politics. The key question today is whether the Cold War should finally end within the framework of the 20th century or whether it should continue indefinitely. Western Europe insists on the latter\u00a0\u2013 not because of any grand strategy, but because it has failed to integrate its former adversaries peacefully. The US, on the other hand, appears ready to move on.<\/p>\n