{"id":3222,"date":"2025-02-23T16:39:23","date_gmt":"2025-02-23T17:39:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.developeternal.com\/?p=3222"},"modified":"2025-02-23T18:26:47","modified_gmt":"2025-02-23T18:26:47","slug":"ukraine-faces-tougher-terms-in-new-us-minerals-proposal-media","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.developeternal.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/23\/ukraine-faces-tougher-terms-in-new-us-minerals-proposal-media\/","title":{"rendered":"Ukraine faces tougher terms in new US minerals proposal \u2013 media"},"content":{"rendered":"
Washington reportedly seeks 100% ownership of an intended $500 billion fund based on the Kiev\u2019s natural resources<\/strong><\/p>\n The Trump administration has presented Ukraine with a revised draft agreement demanding full US ownership of an envisaged $500 billion fund derived from Ukraine\u2019s natural resources. While the new proposal contains largely the same provisions that Kiev previously rejected, it appears to be even tougher, multiple media reports suggest.<\/p>\n Ukraine was presented with the revised proposal on Friday, the New York Times reported, citing unnamed Ukrainian officials and a draft of the deal. The new document outlines that the US would hold 100% ownership of the proposed fund, receiving the entirety of the financial interest from it. Under this arrangement, Ukraine would contribute half of the future revenues from its mineral extraction to the fund, as well as earnings from ports and other infrastructure.<\/p>\n The new document specifies the amount of $500 billion as the goal for the fund, unlike its previous version, the NYT noted. Previously, that sum had been mentioned by US President Donald Trump. The new draft still does not provide any specific security guarantees for Kiev, nor oblige the US to use the fund to invest in Ukraine, stating only that Washington could reinvest a portion of the revenue into the country\u2019s reconstruction.<\/p>\n